home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990
/
1990 Time Magazine Compact Almanac, The (1991)(Time).iso
/
time
/
091889
/
09188900.012
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1990-09-17
|
3KB
|
52 lines
ETHICS, Page 67Death WishA Georgia quadriplegic wins the right to end his life
Larry McAfee was an avid outdoorsman. Growing up in south
Georgia, he loved to fish, hunt and play baseball. But all that
ended in 1985, when a motorcycle accident left him paralyzed from
the neck down. Since then he has lost his zest for living. McAfee,
33, thus petitioned a Georgia court for permission to turn off the
ventilator that has been keeping him alive. As the former civil
engineer testified in an emotional bedside hearing last month, he
woke up every morning "fearful of each new day. There is nothing
I have found or can think of that I really enjoy or that has helped
my situation."
Last week McAfee got his wish. Superior Court Judge Edward
Johnson of Fulton County, Ga., ruled that McAfee's right to refuse
life-sustaining treatment outweighed the state's interest in
preserving life. "The ventilator to which he is attached is not
prolonging his life; it is prolonging his death," said Johnson.
With the court's authorization, McAfee plans to move from a nursing
home to a friend's apartment and end his life by using a
mouth-activated timer to shut off the ventilator after medical
personnel have sedated him.
McAfee's situation has revived a smoldering controversy over
whether health-care providers should help the disabled commit
suicide. In July a paraplegic in Michigan successfully petitioned
a court to have his respirator turned off. Some officials denounced
that action, saying it set a dangerous example for the handicapped
by encouraging them to end their lives rather than strive for a
meaningful existence. In McAfee's case, Judge Johnson has
exonerated anyone who helps the patient carry out his plan. John
Banja, a professor of medical ethics at Emory University, notes
that hospitals have no clear mandate for "treatment
discontinuance," and the role of doctors and nurses in these
affairs remains murky. However, adds Banja, "this is a clear-cut
case of a rational adult. The decision lets McAfee decide if his
life is meaningful or not."
The McAfee case comes at a time when the right-to-die issue is
taking on new urgency in the U.S. Most such cases, unlike McAfee's,
involve comatose patients whose families are seeking to withdraw
life-support systems. This fall the U.S. Supreme Court will rule
on such a situation for the first time when it considers the case
of Nancy Cruzan, 32, a Missouri factory worker who has been in an
irreversible vegetative state for six years. The court has been
asked to decide whether there is a constitutional right of privacy
broad enough to allow Cruzan's family to disconnect the feeding
tubes that nourish her, and thereby to let her die. An alliance of
disability-rights activists and antiabortion groups has already
begun to clash with patients' advocates and civil libertarians in
what promises to be a bitter battle.